PRODUCT · FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Follow the money — without waiting for an accountant.
Bank statements, cashbooks, unexplained wealth. Conectir runs the standard forensic methods with every sum computed by code in plain sight — and pairs every flag with an innocent explanation. Leads, never a verdict.
BANK DEPOSITS METHOD · COMPUTED BY CODE · FICTIONAL SAMPLE
| Total deposits, all accounts | 640,000.00 |
| − Own-account transfers | 45,000.00 |
| − Re-deposited cash | 30,000.00 |
| = Net deposits (A) | 565,000.00 |
| − Declared turnover (D) | 275,000.00 |
| = UNEXPLAINED | 290,000.00 |
HOW IT WORKS
From a shoebox of statements to leads in an afternoon.
Load the records
The engine checks and computes
Flags, with the innocent reading
THE PROBLEM IT SOLVES
Most investigators are not accountants.
When financial records land in a case, the choice is usually to skip them or to wait weeks for a specialist. Conectir is the structured starting point: it runs the same methods a forensic accountant would start with — and builds the working papers one would later rely on. It does not replace them; it tells you when the case is worth their fee.
- Net worth, source & application, and bank deposits methods
- Benford's Law, gap/sequence, duplicates, outliers, trend analysis
- An unexplained amount as a range — never false precision
ARITHMETIC YOU CAN DEFEND
Code does the sums. AI writes the leads.
Every total, schedule and test is computed by code and laid out so a reviewer can rebuild it — the AI never produces a number of its own. It classifies deposits for you to confirm, then writes the flags, each paired with an innocent explanation: inheritance, an informal loan, a spouse's income, a clerical error. You set the net-worth method's living-expenses band yourself (5–50%), and the exact percent you chose is quoted everywhere the range appears — the results, the narrative, the working papers. The unexplained amount is a question, never a verdict.
- Statements reconciled before any method runs
- Every flag paired with a realistic innocent explanation
- Saved to the case and recorded on the court-ready audit trail
IT SHOWS ITS OWN GAPS
The tool tells you what the records don't cover.
Missing records are the biggest limit on any financial method — so Conectir maps them instead of hoping. A coverage bar per account shows, month by month across the case period, where the records are solid, where they run thin, and where there is nothing at all. A sparse month is often the real lead: a statement page quietly missing. The written analysis must name each gap, say which method it weakens, and treat an undeclared gap as a lead — a gap is a limit on every method, never evidence of anything by itself.
RECORD COVERAGE · COMPUTED BY CODE · FICTIONAL SAMPLE
- A coverage bar per account — covered, sparse and missing months, computed by code
- Sparse months judged against that account's own rhythm, so a naturally quiet account never false-alarms
- Gaps carried into the results, the report, the PDF and the Excel working papers
ONE CASE, ONE REPORT
The analysis travels with the case file.
A financial analysis doesn't live in a silo. It is reproduced in full as a lettered annexure at the back of the court-ready investigation report — alongside the SCAN-analysed statements and any attached OSINT person reports — with the executive summary pointing at each letter and the exhibit schedule agreeing. One click also downloads Excel working papers where every derived figure is a live formula over the raw rows: arithmetic all the way down, exactly what a reviewing accountant or opposing expert asks for.
- A lettered annexure in the investigation report — on screen and in the PDF, always in step
- Excel working papers a reviewer can rebuild — live formulas, never pasted numbers
- Saved analyses keep your inputs: Edit & re-run reproduces the result exactly